Apparently, Gmail spell check does not recognized "googled" as a word (past tense of "to google"). Will Microsoft spell checkers recognize "binged" as a word?
...and that's all I have to say about that.
UPDATE: It looks like Roger Shuy at Language Log has gotten on this bandwagon (a month after us, but he's welcomed aboard). He re-iterates Faldone's point (see my comments) and suggests that Microsoft might be bucking this trend of verbing a trademark with bing. He then makes (ahem) the same joke I did. Welcome aboard Roger.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
TV Linguistics - Pronouncify.com and the fictional Princeton Linguistics department
[reposted from 11/20/10] I spent Thursday night on a plane so I missed 30 Rock and the most linguistics oriented sit-com episode since ...
-
The commenters over at Liberman's post Apico-labials in English all clearly prefer the spelling syncing , but I find it just weird look...
-
(image from Slate.com ) I tend to avoid Slate.com these days because, frankly, I typically find myself scoffing at some idiot article they&...
-
Matt Damon's latest hit movie Elysium has a few linguistic oddities worth pointing out. The film takes place in a dystopian future set i...
5 comments:
"Binged"? I figured it for a strong verb---uninflected bing, simple past bang, past participle bung.
heehee, strong "bang" could cause problems in the progressive: "Dude, I was banging your sister last night. Guess what I found..."
Considerably less obscene with "googling."
BTW, thanks to the famed wug test, I just assumed a novel verb would be given regular morphology. Though, you're right that it bears a strong resemblance to verbs like sing & wring.
odds of recognising binge-d are pretty high...
And, since Google™ undoubtedly discourages the use of their trademarked name in a generic sense, you'll probably never see its use as a verb in its spell-checker dictionary.
Post a Comment