Monday, November 22, 2010

unaxseptable

kottke rants against Google's biased calculator (because it provides an answer rather than search results) then finishes with this:

Google! This. Is. Un. Acce. Ptable!

Huh? Does kottke have dyslexia*? I get the staccato pronunciation he's representing, but that's not at all how I would say it. I would say (and write): Un. Ac. Cept. Able! Even if you want to pose your own variation, can we agree that kottke's is simply not a viable analysis of the syllable structure of the word? The double "c" spelling makes it a bit odd looking, but it actually helps in the analysis. Each "c" represents a different sound, and each sound should go in a different syllable. And how does he start the final syllable with "pt"! That is unaxseptable!


*Dyslexics can have difficulty counting syllables.

6 comments:

Ryan said...

Maybe he doesn't pronounce the p, and it's by analogy with pterodactyl vel sim.?

Ryan said...
This comment has been removed by the author.
Chris said...

Possible, I guess. I can see not pronouncing the "p" in rapid speech, basically as an error, but I'd be surprised if that was part of his phonological representation. Wouldn't be the first time I was surprised, hehe.

TomV said...

"ptable", pt as in "ptui"--He's so mad he could spit?

Jason M. Adams said...

I think it's satire.. :)

Chris said...

@Jason, the post certainly was tongue-in-cheek, but do you think his syllabic analysis was also?

Putting the Linguistics into Kaggle Competitions

In the spirit of Dr. Emily Bender’s NAACL blog post Putting the Linguistics in Computational Linguistics , I want to apply some of her thou...