Friday, November 7, 2008

"think" vs. "believe"

Good ol' Sitemeter never fails to yield its share of fascinating factoids. For example, earlier today some brave Canadian Googler found my blog by searching for, and I quote, "think vs believe semantic difference".

Having nothing but love for my readers, I think it only fair that I might attempt to address the deep and profound "think" vs. "believe" distinction. Let us take the following two sentences as our minimal pair:

1. Willy thinks that the wine is good.
2. Willy believes that the wine is good.

In both (1) and (2) above there is a verb of cognition (e.g., FrameNet frames Awareness, Certainty) which takes a clause as its complement. The difference lies in the nature of the truth value predicated of the complement clause by the matrix verb (think vs. believe).

We could couch this truth value predication either in terms of a) epistemic modality or b) evidentiality. Either way, the verb "think" denotes lesser confidence in the truth of the complement clause than the verb "believe" (and they both denote less confidence than the verb "know").

So (1) should be interpreted as meaning Willy has weak confidence in the belief that the wine is good, whereas (2) should be interpreted as meaning that Willy has strong confidence that the wine is good. So the difference between "think" and "believe" is one of degree in confidence of the truth of X (where X is a proposition...which is a tad redundant if you take it to be the case that only propositions have truth value...)

You'll have to try the wine yourself to decide if Willy knows his wine or not.

1 comment:

Aviv said...

No. When we say that willy thinks the wine is good,it means His verbl thoughs( "The little voice in willy's head" that allows him to think verbally in his mind, part of his ego if you will), literally says "This wine is good" or it may even say "I think this wine is good" or,"Wow,this wine is tasty", or "This is good" or "This is tasty", and any other verbal thoughts in willy's mind that convey that the wine is good and tasty.(Here we assume "good" means tasty, because "good" is such a general term that can have so many different meanings. Good for what? Good for health, wealth, happiness? Here it means tastes good.)
When we say willy believes that the wine is good, all the sentences above that might went through willys head when he thought that the wine was good may still go through willy's mind but this time he just cant prove that the wine is "good"/tasty (because he doesn't have enough objective opinions about the taste of the wine, and willy's opinion is subjective to his experience of the wine's taste. Only after we will have two more opinions about the taste of the wine,
it will be possible to determine if the wine is "really" good or not, this is just how human's minds work). So, as lack of evidence he now only believes that the wine is good, as opposed to knowing when enough evidence is present.
So the difference is: thinking(in the context of this article) is hearing or expresing sentences that convey certain options about certain things, and beliving is the thinking without the ability to prove it.

TV Linguistics - and the fictional Princeton Linguistics department

 [reposted from 11/20/10] I spent Thursday night on a plane so I missed 30 Rock and the most linguistics oriented sit-com episode since ...